US Secretary of State Hilary Clinton visited Burma this week, marking the first high-level visit to Myanmar in half a century. She met with the country's new president, Thein Sein, as well as opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi.
Partly because the military government has recently launched a series of reforms (including a promise to release 6,300 prisoners, including political prisoners, in October), Suu Kyi will participate in next year's elections, after her party boycotted last year's. Her National League for Democracy (NLD), will compete for 48 vacant parliamentary seats in the election.
Critics, however, remain wary of the military-backed Union Solidarity and Development Party (USDP) and its election tactics, and urge foreign governments to pay close attention to Burmese politics for the next critical year before rewarding the military junta for its new political and economic policies.
We work with Shan refugees in Thailand to build a well-educated, healthy, and economically robust community, and to restore dignity, assert social rights, and help lay the foundations for their participation in a future democratic Burma.
Showing posts with label Burma. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Burma. Show all posts
Wednesday, November 30, 2011
Tuesday, September 20, 2011
Our community and their hopes of return to Burma
As mentioned in our July post, two master's students from England spent time systematically asking the refugees in-depth questions about their hopes for return to Burma, their liminal status in Thailand, and their best chances for a good livelihood along the Thai-Burmese border. We have been using the information they collected in our latest needs assessments for new services.
Among their findings are that many of the younger refugees stated that Shan State in Burma represented "home" to them, even though they were born in Thailand. More pragmatic factors, such as employment and Thai citizenship, tend to influence their place of residency but not their sense of home:
“I don’t want to go back because I have this house but of course Shan state is
always in my heart, my motherland (laughs).”
Still, for many, the political instability at home looms as large (or larger) as a "push" factor than the "pull" factor of economic prosperity in Thailand.
“I sometimes think about Shan state and I want to go back but I know it is too
dangerous. If Burma was peaceful and had no military [rule] like Thailand of course I
would go back.”
“I miss Shan state, but I don’t miss that people were so poor, and we could only just eat, and had to wear many old clothes stitched together. But in Thailand... it is easier to live and make money and even second hand clothes are so much better than in Shan state."
As the refugees have described to BRP staff before, Shan migrants in Thailand both feel like "caged animals" and second-rate citizens "below" Thai nationals:
“I am still scared to live in Thailand because they can still kill, arrest, do anything, although it is still safer than in Shan state.”
“If Burma is a peaceful and developed country I would go back because we have
land and garden there and in Thailand we have no human rights.”
At the same time, some also expressed a counternarrative, that the Shan performed essential tasks that Thais no longer desired.
Caught between such push and pull factors, the refugees' temporary residence is their only means of being-- As one woman described her guest worker visa, "This passport is my life."
Among their findings are that many of the younger refugees stated that Shan State in Burma represented "home" to them, even though they were born in Thailand. More pragmatic factors, such as employment and Thai citizenship, tend to influence their place of residency but not their sense of home:
“I don’t want to go back because I have this house but of course Shan state is
always in my heart, my motherland (laughs).”
Still, for many, the political instability at home looms as large (or larger) as a "push" factor than the "pull" factor of economic prosperity in Thailand.
“I sometimes think about Shan state and I want to go back but I know it is too
dangerous. If Burma was peaceful and had no military [rule] like Thailand of course I
would go back.”
“I miss Shan state, but I don’t miss that people were so poor, and we could only just eat, and had to wear many old clothes stitched together. But in Thailand... it is easier to live and make money and even second hand clothes are so much better than in Shan state."
As the refugees have described to BRP staff before, Shan migrants in Thailand both feel like "caged animals" and second-rate citizens "below" Thai nationals:
“I am still scared to live in Thailand because they can still kill, arrest, do anything, although it is still safer than in Shan state.”
“If Burma is a peaceful and developed country I would go back because we have
land and garden there and in Thailand we have no human rights.”
At the same time, some also expressed a counternarrative, that the Shan performed essential tasks that Thais no longer desired.
Caught between such push and pull factors, the refugees' temporary residence is their only means of being-- As one woman described her guest worker visa, "This passport is my life."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)